February 2007


We consider a spacecraft formation reconfiguration problem in the case of identical spacecraft. This introduces in the optimal reconfiguration problem a permutational degree of freedom, in addition to the choice of individual spacecraft trajectories. We approach this using a coupled combinatorial and continuous optimization framework, in which the inner loop consists of computing the costs associated with a particular assignment by using a geometrically exact and numerically efficient discrete optimal control method based on Lie group variational integrators. In the outer optimization loop, combinatorial techniques are used to determine the optimal assignments based on the costs computed in the inner loop. The proposed method is demonstrated on the optimal reconfiguration problem for 5 identical spacecraft to go from an inline configuration to one equally spaced on a circle.

arXiv.org:math.OC/0702738

Motivated by attitude control and attitude estimation problems for a rigid body, computational methods are proposed to propagate uncertainties in the angular velocity and the attitude. The nonlinear attitude flow is determined by Euler-Poincaré equations that describe the rotational dynamics of the rigid body acting under the influence of an attitude dependent potential and by a reconstruction equation that describes the kinematics expressed in terms of an orthogonal matrix representing the rigid body attitude. Uncertainties in the angular velocity and attitude are described in terms of ellipsoidal sets that are propagated through this highly nonlinear attitude flow. Computational methods are proposed, one method based on a local linearization of the attitude flow and two methods based on propagation of a small (unscented) sample selected from the initial uncertainty ellipsoid. Each of these computational methods is constructed using the Lie group variational integrator algorithm, viewed as a discretization of the attitude flow dynamics. Computational results are obtained that indicate (1) the strongly nonlinear attitude flow characteristics and (2) the limitations of each of these methods, and indeed any method, in providing effective global bounds on the nonlinear attitude flow.

arXiv:math.DS/0702737